This is an Amino I made for the Courage the Dog fandom you can join if you want
What's on your mind?
I need to know the song eustus was listening to that he called velvet Vic. I looked velvet Vic up and I didn't find the actual song just the clip from the show
Idk how to edit pages, but Tulip in Tulip's Worm could possibly be a nod to Fantastic Planet.
Here's the plot:
After the evil vet sent parents off to the moon, Courage was abandoned while a puppy, but he then lives in
a house with a connected garage near the fictional town of Nowhere, Kansas with Muriel Bagge and her
grumpy husband, Eustace Bagge. He then overcomes his own fears to heroically defend his unknowing
farmer owners from all kinds of dangers and paranormal events so many times, Later then, Di Lung shows Courage that he wasn't ALWAYS egotastic, for he knows how to bring his parents back.
So they both had to face previous menaces along with the clone of the Space Chicken that rules
them all. (And wouldn't you know it? He's gotten Eustace & Muriel last the last other times...)
9 Votes in Poll
Was the Cruel Veterinarian's Rocket based on Proton and Delta II?
Hey, I got this episode stuck in my head that I only once watched in my childhood and I'm not even sure if it's from this show, but it should be. In the episode (watched it in german) courage is asking multiple times "what is funny" or "what is weird" or something like that. Then he says, I don't know, was that funny (or weird or whatever)? Asking the audience. Then after asking that 3 people, I suppose the farmers are repeating his words in a weird chanty manner. Something like: What - is - fun - ny, What - is - fun - ny... and so on. While the sing it you can hear a subtle western e- guitar playing. It had a creepy vibe but I guess almost every episode does. That's all I remember. Does anybody know the episode or does that sound familiar? Please help
Hi, I was just posting to show a research video I did on if the Courage the Cowardly Dog show was based on real life like the image below suggests. I'm just looking for feedback and opinions thanks in advance! Here's the link: youtube.com/watch?v=lORFrKJi8I4
This is the place to talk about your favorite topic, to share news, theories, ideas, and to connect with others. The content from your Forum has been converted to Discussions posts, so nothing has been lost.
To learn more about what you can do here, check out community.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Discussions
If you're an admin on this community, read more about how you can customize your Discussions and set up guidelines for contributors: community.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Admin_and_Moderator_Tools_in_Discussions
Hello! I'm Tono555, and I'm representing Wikia's Vanguard team. We're users who volunteer to help communities adopt to new technologies and features, like content portability. We've identified your community as a high priority for introducing the Portable Infobox tool, which has a lot of benefits for your community. Rather than get into all of the metrics and numbers (though I can present some of those if you're interested), I'll keep it simple. I'd like upgrade the Infobox templates themselves so that they can be accessible on any current and future platform. Maintaining them if you want to make changes should be very simple.
I'm going to add some Drafts of Infoboxes in Special:Insights/nonportableinfoboxes, which you can modify or approve early if you'd like. There are guides and resources on the Portability Hub for the structure and styles that can help you modify them. I've put the styling here. Everything should work properly as set up, so if we don't hear back from you, we'll assume there were no problems and will come back and approve the work as-is on or after October 31.
Also, if you have any questions or concerns, please let me know. Thanks!
Tono555 (Talk) 06:48, October 20, 2016 (UTC)
I've heard news about the creators wanting to bring him back? Is he really coming back?
I don't mean to be an ignorant fool, but why are all of the posts inactive? Is this a ghost town?
Katz, Le Quack?
Please do the above thing.
Admins: If you see any categories which are commonly added, but shouldn't be, please append the category's name to MediaWiki:Categoryblacklist. This will prevent anyone from re-creating that catagory (or using it, which can be the same as re-creating it).
Users: Please report any categories which need to be blacklisted to a member of the CtCD staff (preferably an active admin/bureaucrat).
A couple of good indicators for such categories are:
a) The category has been deleted multiple times.
b) The category has been repeatedly removed from articles.
You may report these on MediaWiki_talk:Categoryblacklist or on one of our Message Walls.
I think we should re-enable achievements. They would provide much needed incentive for users to make useful contributions. There's a strong pattern, ever since the feature was disabled, of users contributing a few times then disappearing, which I believe is because they got zero positive feedback. It seems to work quite well on most wiki's, and this one really needs anything it can get. Aside from a very small handful of active users, (like 6 including admins), this place is DEAD. And there's no reason it should be...
Due to the vast majority of Courage The Cowardly Dog characters being one time charectors i believe we should make a category for them any questions?.
Just a heads-up to everyone (Bureau's/Admins mainly), I've implemented few new features for this wiki:
We now have a page that will display all duplicate images in the database; MediaWiki:DuplicateImages
I've also included "Duplicate images" in with some quick links for site maintenance in the Special:RecentChanges page (near the top).
There is now a feature for updating file-links across all pages when renaming an image. When you click the Edit dropdown while on an image page, and click Rename, you will notice a button which says "Rename and Replace". Once you've changed the name of the image, clicking this button will rename the image to what you specified and proceed to update all links pointing to the old filename, on all pages. (Btw, in order for the renamed image on the pages to be immediately visible, and not a redlink, you will need to click the (UTC) part of the clock above the navigation menu. This will purge the server cache and update the page.)
I also changed the little button that appears below galleries to be more accurate, indicating that you can also *edit* the gallery, not just add photos to it. i.e. you can change the layout and how it looks & stuff.
What's our policy on image deletion? For example, what should we be doing with images which are "outdated" i.e. the image has a superior version available with the same content but at a higher resolution/quality? Titlecards are a prime example. Should we be deleting them, or just leaving them alone?
I'd like to propose a discussion about these two categories; Deuteragonists and Tritagonists.
First off, Category:Deuteragonists is apparently intended for "characters who appear at least twice throughout the series" -- which is not even remotely close to what the word "deuteragonist" means, if it even has a true definition -- So I propose that we rename it to "Secondary Characters", or something similar.
As for Category:Tritagonists, it seems to be for characters who only appear in one episode, but again, "tritagonists" is not really the correct word for that, it has other meanings too so it makes things quite confusing. Therefore, I propose renaming it to "Tertiary Characters", or something similar.
We could also create "Primary Characters" for those who appear more than twice, such as Katz, Le Quack, Shirley, Di Lung, etc.
That way, we would have three solidly defined categories for every character on the show -- "Primary Characters", "Secondary Characters", and "Tertiary Characters" -- and each one would fit unambiguously within one of those three categories.
So what is everyone's opinion on that?
So, we have these three episode templates:
Template:EpisodeNav is redundant, because all of its information is already contained in Template:Episode. On the other hand, Template:EpisodeInfo has some extra information, but together with Template:Episode it looks awkward and cluttered, as demonstrated by the Dr. Le Quack, Amnesia Specialist article.
Right now, the episode articles are not uniform (some have only Template:Episode, others have Template:EpisodeInfo and Template:EpisodeNav, etc.).
Therefore, we need to decide whether some of these templates should be merged, and then use them uniformly across all episodes. Thoughts? IvaneGamkrelidze (talk) 06:23, October 17, 2013 (UTC)